The court has fixed June 9 for trial to resume...
Isteri bekas PM Najib Razak, Rosmah Mansor diarah membela diri atas tuduhan penyelewengan dana bagi projek pembekalan dan pemasangan tenaga solar di 369 sekolah luar bandar di Sarawak.
Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur, Mohamed Zaini Mazlan membuat keputusan itu selepas mendapati pihak pendakwaan berjaya mewujudkan prima facie bagi ketiga-tiga kes tersebut. "Pihak pendakwa berjaya membuktikan kes prima facie terhadap tertuduh ke atas ketiga-tiga pertuduhan." "Dengan ini saya memanggil tertuduh untuk membela diri," kata Zaini.
Rosmah, memilih untuk memberikan keterangan sumpah dari kandang saksi. Ini setelah Hakim Mohd Zaini memerintahkannya untuk membela diri. Suaminya Najib Razak berada di dalam mahkamah untuk memberikan sokongan moralnya.
Rosmah, 69, dibicarakan atas satu tuduhan meminta RM187.5 juta dan dua tuduhan menerima rasuah RM6.5 juta berkaitan projek bernilai RM1.25 bilion itu daripada bekas Pengarah Urusan Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd Saidi Abang Samsudin.
Rasuah terbabit didakwa diterima menerusi bekas pegawai khasnya Rizal Mansor sebagai upah membantu Jepak Holdings memperoleh Projek Bersepadu Sistem Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Hibrid, serta Penyelenggaraan dan Operasi Genset/Diesel bagi 369 sekolah luar bandar Sarawak, bernilai RM1.25 bilion secara rundingan terus daripada Kementerian Pendidikan.
Perbuatan itu didakwa dilakukan di Lygon Cafe, Sunway Putra Mall, Jalan Putra; di kediamannya di Jalan Langgak Duta, Taman Duta dan di Seri Perdana, Persiaran Seri Perdana, Presint 10, Putrajaya antara Januari 2016 dan September 2017. - mk
Now Rosmah Is Guilty
Until Proven Innocent...
Rosmah ordered by High Court to submit defence on corruption charges RM1.25b project for electricity to 369 schools in Sarawak. High Court judge Mohd Zaini Mazlan said prosecution proven prima facie case on all three charges, including soliciting bribe.
“It is my finding that the prosecution has adduced credible evidence to prove every element of the offences under the three charges, which, if unrebutted, warrants a conviction” said Zaini.
Zaini also admitted the “Can I advise you something” audio clips as evidence. The prosecution applied to admit audio clip to show Rosmah’s “overbearing” nature.
Rosmah's has 3 options ...
a. sworn evidence can be cross-examined
b. unsworn statement
c. remain silent.
Rosmah chose to give a sworn statement
So folks since Rosmah's defense has been called it means at this juncture the Court sees her as guilty of all charges.
“It is my finding that the prosecution has adduced credible evidence to prove every element of the offences under the three charges, which, if unrebutted, warrants a conviction” said High Court judge Mohd Zaini Mazlan.
Rosmah has chosen to give a sworn statement from the accused dock. The lawyers should tell us what this means and the pros and cons of an accused person resorting to this type of defense.
Rosmah has chosen to read a statement from the dock because she cannot find sufficient witnesses who can testify in her favour. - Syed Akbar Ali
Pengajaran dan pembelajaran Didik TV ntv7...
DAP rep files MACC report on
Rina Harun's 'source of wealth'...
A day after questioning Women, Family and Community Development Minister Rina Harun's source of wealth, DAP's Canning assemblyperson Jenny Choy proceeded to file a report urging the MACC to probe the minister. Rina has been in the spotlight after she settled her debts to a Paris-based film company around RM1.3 million to avoid being declared bankrupt.
Choy had publicly asked Rina how she managed to accumulate the settlement amount in a short period of 15 months as Rina's assets declaration data showed her assets at RM72,000 when the data was made public in November 2019.
"Referring to MACC's asset declaration data in November 2019, Rina declared that her assets stood at RM72,000 with a monthly income of RM34,004.48. "If Rina's source of income did not change, she will need approximately 40 months to collect enough funds to pay off her debts without spending a sen of her income. "As being a cabinet minister and public servant, MACC should show its responsibility and take immediate action to probe her," she said in a statement.
Choy, DAP Youth's vice-chief, urged MACC to investigate if Rina had received an additional income source. She filed the report at the MACC office in Ipoh.
Paris-based Sarl Novovision sued Rina on Nov 8, 2018, demanding that the full amount owed be paid by July 31, 2019. The claim was for several films, comedy shows and documentaries in the comedy genre sold to three companies in which Rina was director.
Rina was served a bankruptcy notice for debts owed to Sarl Novovision to the tune of RM1,340,642.02 as of Nov 17, 2020. Rina, who was one of the directors of the now-defunct companies, Eurofine (M) Sdn Bhd, Fine Mobile Network Sdn Bhd and Fine TV Network Sdn Bhd, had purchased several comedy shows and documentaries from the French company.
In May 2014, Rina and another company director, Ida Rahayu Md Noor, had entered into a guarantee agreement with Sarl Novovision that they would personally and jointly undertake all liabilities of the companies. However, the companies were closed down between December 2013 and August 2015, respectively. - mk
cheers.
Sumber asal: Big Mama kena bukti dia tak bersalah...
{ 0 comments... read them below or add one }
Post a Comment