Sebelum PRU 14 PAS kata dah menang kes 90 juta di London. Maka mendabik dada semua penyokong2 PAS konon dah pun menang. Memaki hamun PH yang masa tu masih lagi pembangkang.. kononnya memfitnah menerima 90 juta dari SRC 1MDB. Kalu dah menang,kenapa nak minta derma lagi?
2. Ini semua bagi kes-kes saman "fitnah" antara Presiden parti ehem vs Sarawak Report yang akan dibicarakan di mahkamah di London nanti.
3. Apa pun teruskanlah saman tu dan carilah wang untuk bayar kos peguam tu.Mudah- mudahan berjaya bayar kos guaman itu. Dan diandaikan kes itu jadi bicara dan tak ditarik balik , saya rasa mesti Presiden parti ehem sudah 100 peratus ready untuk bagi keterangan di mahkamah di London itu nanti dan sudah siap siaga untuk disoal balas ( cross examined ) oleh QC...peguambela Sarawak Report.
4. Saya pernah baca transkrip perbicaraan kes mantan PM Singapore menyaman sebuah majalah antarabangsa ( FEER ) di mahkamah di Singapura yang juga kes fitnah.
6. Begitu juga mantan Presiden Singapura, Goh Chok Tong juga pernah disoal balas dengan begitu "brutal" oleh George Carman QC ( a superb cross examiner) juga dalam kes fitnah yang melibatkan saman antara mantan PM itu dengan mendiang Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam. Kes itu juga dibicarakan di Singapura. Hanya sekadar baca transkrip George Carman QC soal balas Goh Chok Tong pun bulu roma saya dah meremang.
7. Tapi , saya yakin agamawan hebat seperti Presiden parti ehem mungkin tidak ada masalah jika disoal balas oleh QC yang mewakili Sarawak Report di mahkamah di London itu nanti. Yang lagi best sudah tentu melihat jika nama-nama individu tertentu yang disebut dalam dokumen di mahkamah ( cause papers ) disapina untuk jadi saksi dan disoal balas..mesti lejen punya.
8. We never know mungkin jika Allah mengkehendaki tengok tengok saya juga sekonyong-konyong tiba- tiba akan ada di mahkamah di London itu ..menyaksikan perbicaraan itu. Agaknya lah. Mungkin ya, mungkin tidak.
9. Good luck pungut derma untuk kes di London. - YB Sepang.
Dua 'presiden' UMNO (mantan dan mantin) yang Hadi sokong itu sekarang sudah dihadapkan ke mahkamah atas tuduhan songlap duit beratus juta. Duit yang mereka curi mungkin melebihi GDP negeri Kelantan.
Setakat ini duit jamin (bail money) mereka sahaja lebih daripada RM10 juta. Duit jamin mereka sahaja sudah jadikan mereka jutawan atau millionaire. Biarlah Pas pegang Kelantan untuk tempoh 30 tahun lagi, kemungkinan paling besar rakyat Kelantan dan sekarang Terengganu akan menjadi lebih miskin. Kelantan adalah negeri termiskin dalam Malaysia - di bawah Sabah dan Sarawak sekali.
Tuduhan Sarawak Report ialah pemimpin UMNO (yang sekarang dikenakan tuduhan rasuah dan songlap duit di mahkamah) telah memberi duit sebanyak RM90 juta kepada Hadi dan Pas. Tujuannya untuk membeli sokongan Pas dalam PRU14.
Maka Hadi pun mengambil tindakan gopoh saman malu terhadap Sarawak Report di mahkamah di London. London adalah ibukota yang paling mahal did unia. Yuran peguam pun memerlukan berjuta Ringgit.
Setakat ini peguam Mat Salleh sudah dibayar RM2.5 juta - kata Pas. Ok tetapi siapa sebenarnya yang bayar duit RM2.5 juta itu? Pas akan perlukan duit berjuta-juta Ringgit lagi sebelum kes ini boleh selesai.
Dan tiada jaminan Pas akan menang kes ini di mahkamah di London. Tambah malang bagi lebai-lebai malang ini UMNO sudah kalah teruk di pilihanraya dan sekarang berada di sakratul maut.
Mana perginya ahli2 kaya-raya tu?
Surah al Nisaa ayat 10: - "Sesungguhnya orang-orang yang memakan harta anak-anak yatim secara zalim, sebenarnya mereka itu hanyalah menelan api ke dalam perut mereka; dan mereka pula akan masuk ke dalam api neraka yang menyala-nyala."
Jadi inilah yang sedang berlaku kepada Najib, Rosmah, Zahid, Ku Nan, Azeez dan beberapa orang lagi. Azab mereka belum bermula pun. Ikut undang-undang mereka boleh dipenjarakan untuk tempoh sehingga 20 tahun. Nauzubillah.
Yang sepatutnya orang yang menerima duit dari Najib pun harus diambil tindakan mahkamah dan dipenjarakan jika salah. MACC dan Polis harus menangani perkara ini kerana ia tetap salah dan menjadi jenayah besar.
Apakah masih ada lagi dalam dunia ini manusia yang begitu bodoh dan kerdil otak pemikiran mereka yang sanggup menghulur duit untuk membantu perbuatan menelan duit curi dan duit anak yatim?
Apakah kekufuran mereka sudah begitu menebal disebabkan mereka jahil dan bodoh? Kita lihatlah nasib mereka nanti. Bala itu boleh tiba dari satu penjuru yang mereka tidak sangka pun. - ostb
Throne in turmoil...
Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad on Friday refused to quash swirling speculation that the country’s king, Sultan Muhammad V, is set to abdicate after two months of absence on medical grounds.
With rising concerns over the stability of Mahathir’s eight-month-old ruling coalition, online commentators had wondered aloud whether a dramatic upheaval of the monarchy – which continues to hold significant sway – would pose another headache for the 93-year-old premier.
Rumours that the monarch would either be leaving of his own volition or had been asked to quit by provincial sultans who take turns being the Yang di Pertuan Agong, or “king of kings”, have lit up social media since Monday.
Asked about the status of the king during a routine press conference on Friday, Mahathir said he was in the dark.
“Like you, I heard rumours … I didn’t receive any letters or any official indication about anything so I am not going to talk about rumours,” Mahathir said.
Asked if Muhammad V was “back at his role”, the prime minister said: “As far as I know”. Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah, the deputy chief minister of Muhammad V’s provincial seat of Kelantan, said his administration had not heard anything, urging the country’s attorney general to “take action” against those spreading rumours.
The public whispers, including questions about the 49-year-old’s lifestyle, are unusual given the reverence with which most Malaysians view the country’s royalty.
While Malaysia does not have lèse-majesté laws, colonial-era sedition legislation has previously been used against royal critics.
Sultan Muhammad V, who was elected by his peers to serve a five-year term in 2016, was officially due to return from medical leave on January 1, after his deputy, Nazrin Shah, the sultan of the state of Perak, stepped down as the acting king.
During his two-month absence from the national palace, the king reportedly married a Russian beauty queen – although his office has kept mum on the subject.
When quizzed, Mahathir told reporters that he had not heard from the Palace on the matter.
“I don’t know. I don’t have any official confirmation so I can’t say anything.”
Muhammad V himself has yet to make any comment, nor has the Keeper of the Royal Seal, who serves as the secretary to the Council of Rulers – a body comprising Malaysia’s various hereditary sultans and other civilian provincial heads of state.
Earlier on Friday, local English daily The New Straits Times reported that the council had held a “rare and unscheduled” meeting on Wednesday night.
One source told the newspaper “a serious matter” concerning the monarchy was discussed, without specifying if it related to Muhammad V.
With few clues on what happens next, Malaysians have been parsing a cryptic blog post about the royals penned by Mahathir earlier this week.
Mahathir’s first major run-in with the sultans came in 1983, when he forced them to give up the right to veto new laws by withholding assent.
A decade later, he further curtailed their powers by ending their immunity from prosecution following complaints of errant behaviour.
In his January 2 post titled “The Rule of Law”, Mahathir re-emphasised that the monarchs are not above the law.
“The Rule of Law applies to everyone from the Rulers to the Prime Minister and Ministers, to the civil servants and ordinary citizens,” he wrote.
“There is no provision which exempts anyone from the Rule of Law. For the Rulers there is a special court but the laws are the same as the laws applicable to ordinary citizens. The Rulers too must respect the laws. It is disturbing to see blatant breaches of the law being perpetrated in the mistaken belief that immunity has somehow been accorded.”
Mahathir added that public complaints against those who ignore the rule of law “are legitimate and do not breach any law.”
“They will not be considered as sedition in any way. They will be regarded as free speech. Citizens can make reports on these matters or openly speak about them.” - scmp
King attends Friday prayers in Kubang Kerian
cheers.
Credit: http://bit.ly/2LRmOzt
{ 0 comments... read them below or add one }
Post a Comment